<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for HD Voice News</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hdvoicenews.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hdvoicenews.com</link>
	<description>Information about the world of HD voice</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 17:14:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Quick HD voice stats from IT EXPO East 2012 by Alok</title>
		<link>http://hdvoicenews.com/2012/02/04/quick-hd-voice-stats-from-it-expo-east-2012/comment-page-1/#comment-2381</link>
		<dc:creator>Alok</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 17:14:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hdvoicenews.com/?p=1305#comment-2381</guid>
		<description>Michael,For a typical SMB or home ocfife, I&#039;d agree with what you&#039;re saying   moving from G.711 @ 64kbps to wideband at 64kbps is obviously not going to move the needle. Most small businesses using G.711 right now could fully upgrade to wideband IP550s, IP650s, etc., and not notice any change in bandwidth consumption.I think what you&#039;re missing is more highly compressed narrowband, like G.729 running with a payload as low as 8kbps before overhead.A lot of our clients place thousands or tens of thousands of calls per month using IP330 or IP430 phones with G.729 out of necessity. There&#039;s a quality sacrifice there, obviously, but these businesses need to keep bandwidth low or end up paying their ISPs through the nose. As a result, they aren&#039;t as free to move to wideband voice as other small businesses.I really enjoyed reading some articles on your site   you certainly know what you&#039;re talking about when it comes to VoIP codecs. But I think there are cases where a business moving to wideband would need to consider the ramifications on their WAN or LAN.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael,For a typical SMB or home ocfife, I&#8217;d agree with what you&#8217;re saying   moving from G.711 @ 64kbps to wideband at 64kbps is obviously not going to move the needle. Most small businesses using G.711 right now could fully upgrade to wideband IP550s, IP650s, etc., and not notice any change in bandwidth consumption.I think what you&#8217;re missing is more highly compressed narrowband, like G.729 running with a payload as low as 8kbps before overhead.A lot of our clients place thousands or tens of thousands of calls per month using IP330 or IP430 phones with G.729 out of necessity. There&#8217;s a quality sacrifice there, obviously, but these businesses need to keep bandwidth low or end up paying their ISPs through the nose. As a result, they aren&#8217;t as free to move to wideband voice as other small businesses.I really enjoyed reading some articles on your site   you certainly know what you&#8217;re talking about when it comes to VoIP codecs. But I think there are cases where a business moving to wideband would need to consider the ramifications on their WAN or LAN.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Editorial&#8212;The Dutch love HD voice by Quentin</title>
		<link>http://hdvoicenews.com/2012/04/19/editorialthe-dutch-love-hd-voice/comment-page-1/#comment-2242</link>
		<dc:creator>Quentin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Apr 2012 14:25:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hdvoicenews.com/?p=1435#comment-2242</guid>
		<description>France Telecom has been using HD voice with Livebox since 2007.
In 2012-2013 it will be possible to make HD voice calls between «Orange» countries and also between landlines and mobiles.
In 2013, HD voice between different carriers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>France Telecom has been using HD voice with Livebox since 2007.<br />
In 2012-2013 it will be possible to make HD voice calls between «Orange» countries and also between landlines and mobiles.<br />
In 2013, HD voice between different carriers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Editorial&#8212;The Dutch love HD voice by Doug Mohney</title>
		<link>http://hdvoicenews.com/2012/04/19/editorialthe-dutch-love-hd-voice/comment-page-1/#comment-2234</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug Mohney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2012 19:28:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hdvoicenews.com/?p=1435#comment-2234</guid>
		<description>France Telecom has declared (it&#039;s on the blog around July last year) it is working on transcoding between G.722 and AMR-WB (broadband and mobile networks). Timeframe is 2013, if memory serves.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>France Telecom has declared (it&#8217;s on the blog around July last year) it is working on transcoding between G.722 and AMR-WB (broadband and mobile networks). Timeframe is 2013, if memory serves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Editorial&#8212;The Dutch love HD voice by markilou</title>
		<link>http://hdvoicenews.com/2012/04/19/editorialthe-dutch-love-hd-voice/comment-page-1/#comment-2232</link>
		<dc:creator>markilou</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2012 17:48:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hdvoicenews.com/?p=1435#comment-2232</guid>
		<description>regarding your comment on France Telecom Dough: France Telecom has been using HD Voice (G722) on their residential ASDL set-up boxes (Livebox) for a couple of years already, along with some compatible DECT device. Unfortunately -and as most HD Voice initiatives so far as you well know- this is ON-NET only (from livebox line to another livebox line) : G722 is transcoded into standard Narrow Band G711 over the TDM network when a call goes OFF-NET.

Orange having HD Voice on their mobile network in France (using AMR-WB codec) it would be interesting to know whether France Telecom has plans to transcode AMR-WB and G722 to offer wide band continuity from their fixed to their mobile network, that would seem like a logical thing to do...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>regarding your comment on France Telecom Dough: France Telecom has been using HD Voice (G722) on their residential ASDL set-up boxes (Livebox) for a couple of years already, along with some compatible DECT device. Unfortunately -and as most HD Voice initiatives so far as you well know- this is ON-NET only (from livebox line to another livebox line) : G722 is transcoded into standard Narrow Band G711 over the TDM network when a call goes OFF-NET.</p>
<p>Orange having HD Voice on their mobile network in France (using AMR-WB codec) it would be interesting to know whether France Telecom has plans to transcode AMR-WB and G722 to offer wide band continuity from their fixed to their mobile network, that would seem like a logical thing to do&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Sprint HD voice service coming from EVRC-NW&#8211;not LTE by Mobile Voice Quality To Improve As HD Voice Rollout Begins &#8211; Forbes &#124; BigITbd</title>
		<link>http://hdvoicenews.com/2012/04/04/sprint-hd-voice-service-coming-from-evrc-nwnot-lte/comment-page-1/#comment-2190</link>
		<dc:creator>Mobile Voice Quality To Improve As HD Voice Rollout Begins &#8211; Forbes &#124; BigITbd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Apr 2012 12:13:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hdvoicenews.com/?p=1416#comment-2190</guid>
		<description>[...] networks can be upgraded. For example, Sprint is planning to deliver HD voice over its enhanced 3G network over CDMA 1X Advanced technology. The company said the network will be ready in late [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] networks can be upgraded. For example, Sprint is planning to deliver HD voice over its enhanced 3G network over CDMA 1X Advanced technology. The company said the network will be ready in late [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Vonage brags about HD voice in Vonage Mobile soft client by S</title>
		<link>http://hdvoicenews.com/2012/02/08/vonage-brags-about-hd-voice-in-vonage-mobile-soft-client/comment-page-1/#comment-2046</link>
		<dc:creator>S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Mar 2012 03:18:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hdvoicenews.com/?p=1309#comment-2046</guid>
		<description>iSAC.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>iSAC.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on FYI&#8211;&#8220;Cheap&#8221; Nokia phone HD voice support by DaterDu</title>
		<link>http://hdvoicenews.com/2011/12/27/fyicheap-nokia-phone-hd-voice-support/comment-page-1/#comment-1999</link>
		<dc:creator>DaterDu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Mar 2012 06:22:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hdvoicenews.com/2011/12/27/fyicheap-nokia-phone-hd-voice-support/#comment-1999</guid>
		<description>Seems that Asha 302 (announced at MWC2012) supports HD voice too and the prize is not bad</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seems that Asha 302 (announced at MWC2012) supports HD voice too and the prize is not bad</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Huawei forgets to mention HD voice with new phones, tablets at Mobile World Congress by radhakant</title>
		<link>http://hdvoicenews.com/2012/02/27/huawei-forgets-to-mention-hd-voice-with-new-phones-tablets-at-mobile-world-congress/comment-page-1/#comment-1976</link>
		<dc:creator>radhakant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2012 04:32:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hdvoicenews.com/?p=1361#comment-1976</guid>
		<description>Huawei has always underestimated HD-VOICE. Since last 3 years I am following with them on HD-VOICE</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Huawei has always underestimated HD-VOICE. Since last 3 years I am following with them on HD-VOICE</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on NXP Software makes vague HD voice reference for Mobile World Congress by Doug Mohney</title>
		<link>http://hdvoicenews.com/2012/02/24/nxp-software-makes-vague-hd-voice-reference-for-mobile-world-congress/comment-page-1/#comment-1974</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug Mohney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2012 13:47:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hdvoicenews.com/?p=1334#comment-1974</guid>
		<description>A clear contact from a PR person or someone with NXP.com in their email would be accessible.  As would more clear-cut information on NXP&#039;s website. 

The email on NXP&#039;s press release goes to its PR agency. Where it sits until the PR agency gets to it and then sits some more while NXP tries to figure out what to do with it. I know because I&#039;ve gone through this before trying to dig out information on NXP releases.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A clear contact from a PR person or someone with NXP.com in their email would be accessible.  As would more clear-cut information on NXP&#8217;s website. </p>
<p>The email on NXP&#8217;s press release goes to its PR agency. Where it sits until the PR agency gets to it and then sits some more while NXP tries to figure out what to do with it. I know because I&#8217;ve gone through this before trying to dig out information on NXP releases.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on NXP Software makes vague HD voice reference for Mobile World Congress by Noak11</title>
		<link>http://hdvoicenews.com/2012/02/24/nxp-software-makes-vague-hd-voice-reference-for-mobile-world-congress/comment-page-1/#comment-1973</link>
		<dc:creator>Noak11</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2012 13:23:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hdvoicenews.com/?p=1334#comment-1973</guid>
		<description>Didn&#039;t you just get a response from the company?  That&#039;s pretty accessible, don&#039;t you think, Doug?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Didn&#8217;t you just get a response from the company?  That&#8217;s pretty accessible, don&#8217;t you think, Doug?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

